comparison content/SCM/subversion-1.7.md @ 0:4cd9b65e10e4

initial import of the pelican based blog
author Dirk Olmes <dirk@xanthippe.ping.de>
date Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:48:58 +0200
parents
children
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
-1:000000000000 0:4cd9b65e10e4
1 Title: Subversion 1.7
2 Date: 2013-01-07
3 Tags: Subversion
4 Lang: en
5
6 Recently I received a portage update to Subversion 1.7. Since this version uses a new working copy layout I was a bit sceptic about how much work upgrading to 1.7 would really be.
7
8 So far the update went really smooth. I upgraded the svn client and had to migrate (svn upgrade) the working copy. The working copy is significantly smaller after the migration:
9
10 <table border="1" cellpadding="5">
11 <tr>
12 <th>&nbsp;</th>
13 <th>Subversion 1.6</th>
14 <th>Subversion 1.7</th>
15 <th>Size diff</th>
16 </tr>
17 <tr>
18 <td>customer project 1</td>
19 <td>957M</td>
20 <td>676M</td>
21 <td>70.64%</td>
22 </tr>
23 <tr>
24 <td>customer project 2</td>
25 <td>14M</td>
26 <td>7.5M</td>
27 <td>53.57%</td>
28 </tr>
29 <tr>
30 <td>Mule community 3.x</td>
31 <td>342M</td>
32 <td>200M</td>
33 <td>58.48%</td>
34 </tr>
35 </table>
36
37 SVN operations like running an update or reverting a lot of changes seem to be a bit faster. I can't say if subversion in Eclipse behaves faster or not - haven't my mind made up just yet.
38
39 I'll leave the server part and all the related tools (Jenkins, Sventon etc.) for another post later.