Mercurial > hg > Blog
view content/SCM/subversion-1.7.md @ 109:ee048ed76ea1
Datums- und Syntex Fix
author | Dirk Olmes <dirk.olmes@codedo.de> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 18 Jun 2021 07:24:04 +0200 |
parents | 4cd9b65e10e4 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
Title: Subversion 1.7 Date: 2013-01-07 Tags: Subversion Lang: en Recently I received a portage update to Subversion 1.7. Since this version uses a new working copy layout I was a bit sceptic about how much work upgrading to 1.7 would really be. So far the update went really smooth. I upgraded the svn client and had to migrate (svn upgrade) the working copy. The working copy is significantly smaller after the migration: <table border="1" cellpadding="5"> <tr> <th> </th> <th>Subversion 1.6</th> <th>Subversion 1.7</th> <th>Size diff</th> </tr> <tr> <td>customer project 1</td> <td>957M</td> <td>676M</td> <td>70.64%</td> </tr> <tr> <td>customer project 2</td> <td>14M</td> <td>7.5M</td> <td>53.57%</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Mule community 3.x</td> <td>342M</td> <td>200M</td> <td>58.48%</td> </tr> </table> SVN operations like running an update or reverting a lot of changes seem to be a bit faster. I can't say if subversion in Eclipse behaves faster or not - haven't my mind made up just yet. I'll leave the server part and all the related tools (Jenkins, Sventon etc.) for another post later.